Tuesday, February 14, 2006

Claremont, New Hampshire

I'm writing to you to let you know of the corruption that is happening in New Hampshire right now. It's not eminent domain that we have to worry about, it is the judges doing corrective land deeds that give them people rights that were never given to them by the land owners themselves.

This is happening to us right now. When we went to court with this, thinking that it would get straightened out because it is plain to see when they have released all rights and interest to the land when it was sold. This was done on three parcels of land, to get to a landlocked piece of property. Now 20 years later they sell the land and with no way to get to it.

A local judge drafts a corrective deed giving them a right-of-way across three people's property that they had released all their rights to. When taken to court, the judge says she finds that the corrective deed shows that they did not abandon the right-of-way. She fails to tell us at the time of trial that her husband worked for the law firm that did the first corrupted deed in 1980.

Now the owner of this land goes to the bank to get a loan on the property using the whole 35 acres of land when in fact he only has 22.7 using all three properties as land on his road. The bank goes to another local judge's office for a title search. That judge uses the last judge's office deeds. On the three deeds that this person has, not one of the deeds says the same thing. Each deed has changed except the amount of land has never changed. It still says 35 acres and it is hard to fight the judge when they are all covering for each other's mistakes.

Please help if you can to expose this corruption. You can go to the New Hampshire deeds and see for yourself. This is no joke. It is their way to steal and make the person that the land they steal from pay all the expenses for their mistakes.

They want to attach my home for $60,000 for the mistakes that the legal system has made. The judge said we were in bad faith for trying to protect our land.

Could you have the New Hampshire branch of jail4judges call me? I have all the proof. There are only a few towns from where I live, and they can check out my story by the land deeds online.

Please, please help me. Thank you for your time.

David Aiken
PO Box 372
Claremont NH
(603) 542-5811
ppuffsmom@yahoo.com

35 comments:

Anonymous said...

I too live in Claremont...and can very well believe that such things would happen here....Public officals have a very secretive nature here that makes a person wonder just how legitimite the actions of those people are. It just seems if you know the right people or grease the right palms you can get away with doing anything in this town. Lord forbid you even suggest someone is doing anything improper regarding town issues i.e. the wheelabrator fiasco, because if you do officals here seem to have a circle the wagons and protect themselves mentality instead of helping end the intolerable behavior of a select few bad apples.

Anonymous said...

Did you try any of the state agencies that deal with this type of corruption? Did you have any attorney represent you and if so what does he think? Post more information......

mary aiken said...

I did have an attorney. She is as disturbed as we are. Telling me that she doesn't know where the justice is anymore. I have sent some of the information to the attorney general investagation office. Im also filing the paper work for the misconduct of the attorney and judges that were involved the the making of the false deeds. Just to let you know that all this information can be checked out online in the state deeds on nh. Roy Abel and Roger Sargent granted to David Aiken ,Roger Sargent and Marylin Sargent,to Joyce Michard. Roger Sargent, Roy Abel to Lional Davis. The newphew that had the corrective deed made to give himself a right-of-way that wasnt rightfully his is David C.Davis. Now the new update on illegal mess. Now for the bill to steal my land 60,000 dollars his attorney has attached both of my properties to make sure that he gets his money for stealing my property.We will soon be headed for the supreme court with this. Dont know just how they will be or will the corruption continue. My husband just suffered a heart attack two weeks ago.Spent two weeks in the hospital. When we got home I saw that one of the pins was moved to benifit David Davis a little more property . This is the second time a pin has been moved. They want to make sure that we have no access to be able to go on with this case. Two disabled people fighting a case to keep what they have worked a lifetime to give there children. The hardship,this has cost to us is unbarable.Not one night has gone by that I havent spent working this case. I just dont believe that this much corrup0tion is going on. Thank you

Anonymous said...

Is your attorney afraid to do what she has to do? Why wasn't this turned in to the proper people? Do you feel that maybe they are working together to cover for the corruption?You know that most attorneys and judges won't turn their brothers in. How do you feel about the attorney that you have right now? Is she doing what she should be doing? please let us know

Anonymous said...

and post more information, like hw much land is being stole and why you didnt turn in the owner to the proper people

Anonymous said...

I did turn in the owner in. We went to the city of claremont to show them what the deeds had said. Giving up all rights and interest to the land that we bought and showing them just how the city ordiance, that they were violating to use three people's properties to get across to get to this landlocked property. On
his first deed says nothing about anything granting him a right to get to this property. But after he finds out that the only deed that reserved him a right-of-way to his property was done fraudulently he had a attorney do another deed giving him a right-of-way across three properties that the owner before him had released all rights and interest to.The city codes say only two lots per driveway and before that went into effect in 1979 we had already been on the land since 1975 so we were grandfathered in. But you see he had a few good friends on the city boards so he could get away with this. They said he was in all city codes but he never even got a driveway permit to put the driveway in. I would say it would be that he didn't get one because it was that you can only put a driveway in if you are coming off your own road frontage. And if you are coming over three peoples property to get to your then you are not going from your road frontage. Now you must remember this 35 acres lot is in back of the other three parcels. So it was never abutting any of the right-of-of way to the two pieces, only the three piece which is mine. So he was never given a right-of-way from the other two owners in the first place to get to his property. Only on the deed that was done after the subdivision what they did was the person that owner the landlocked parcel had a deed made up saying he owned the second parcel with the other two people so that he could reserve a right-of-way over their piece. When in fact he never own it. So now there is a problem with the road frontage. Went he want to court he tells the judge that there is a problem with his road frontage. His deed says he has 35 acres and he only owns 22.7. But the judge still only goes on the corrective deed. Not asking about the reason that his deed doesnt give the right amount of land. And why he is having problems with his frontage. Two big red flags. Nor does she tell us that her husband worked for the firm that did this first fraud deed. I do find it strange for a judge to sit and judge other judges saying that we are not here to make our own laws just follow the ones that are in place. When I can see that she is doing the thing that she said that they were not to do. Sorry to answer your question at first it was the driveway then after the judge said to make sure he had 15 clear for him to travel to get to his property he made the driveway that was 9 to 10 made it 14ft. As he kept making it wider we put up a block wall to stop him from making it wider. So as you can see he has taken the driveway that each of us have across three peoples properties to get to his. Now in the first deed of the first property the deed says that if you want to use this driveway you must share in the maintaining of it with others that use it. For 20 years no one has shared in maintaning the driveway but us. And the funny thing about this wording it didnt get in the corrective deed as it would have showned that in the last 20 years the previous owner didnt because he had released all his rights and interest to. So there was no reason for him to share in maintaining it. If this person had went by the subdivion plat I dont think anyone would have realized it for at least 20 years and he could have gotten it by adversed possession. His loss, as far as im concerned he could use a plane to get to his property now. mary aiken

Anonymous said...

Sorry I had to put that under anoymous as it wont go under the blogger one that I usually use. Don't know why it wont go. So I will just put my name at the bottom of the message so you will know that im the one posting. Thank you. As you can see what is happening to us can happen to anyone for just a few dollars they can own property that is not theirs. Just to add some more details to this story we did go to the county attorney about the deeds. We went to the bank and showed them. We even went to the banking commissioner and told him. And the letter we got back from the bank says that the bank does not lend money on deeds that dont have clear title. As you can see they lied as they do lend money on property without clear title. So now all the little rats are looking to see just who can escape first from the cage. All of the rats blaming each other for what is going on. When if fact numerous people could have stopped this at any time. They were betting on that two disable people on a limited income would stop by now and let them steal what is not theirs. Since my husband heart attack it has made me more determined to stop this dam corruption. If it means that writing 10 letters a night to show this corruption im going to. I have sent letters to different news people and different What really get me is that his wife is here from Poland and she is sueing us when she hasnt been very truthful in what is happening. As when she went for the loan their deed says they have 35 acres of land and she they know that it is only 22.7. The person at the deed office tells me it will always be that way until it has been survayed and isnt that funny it was done in the subdivision of 1979 so what is the next way to hid this corruption. When the bank did the title search why didnt that show the problems. Which the deed was done by another attorney to cover up the mistakes. mary aiken

Anonymous said...

what about the attorney question?

Anonymous said...

At first I thought that they were working together to cover this up. But when I went back thru all the paper work I did see that she was doing her job. She made the points of the case. She said that when he found out that he didn't have a right-of-way to get to his property he had another corrective deed drawned up to give him a right-of way that wasn't rightfully his. She made the point that he used our land to the bank of his loan. She pointed out that his deed only says 35acres not 22.7 that he has. She pointed out that they didnt ask us to have the power put in over the driveway that they had released all their rights to. She also pointed out that he did not pay to have a title search done. I don't think that she has turned in this corruption in. I do feel that she has put her own self in a bad sitsuation taking my case. She was more aggressive at the begining of the case. But she has done her job at least pointing out the case. It's not like she should have to fit them in the head to see just what is going on. I do feel that she or the other attorney should have turned this in to the proper people.I don't understand why they had the first owner to the property at the court room when we first got there. They called them into the room to chat the judge and two attorneys then they came out. He was no longer in the room. He left the court room.So to me they were covering up something as he comes from Florida. He did't come here for that to just leave the court room. mary aiken

Anonymous said...

did you get a second opinion before you took this to court?

Anonymous said...

I did get a second one. She is the attorney that I have right now. Remember when you know that things are not right you have to make your own decision if you want to just let the attorneys cover for each other or do you want to fight for what is yours. Remember in no deeds did he have a right-of-way granted to him by the owners of the other two parcels that were before our property as his property never came near the right-of-way. Remember also the previous owner released all rights and interest to all three properties before he sold it to his nephew. And at no point has anyone of the property owners have given those rights back to him.
Until he had a corrective land deed done giving him rights that were never giving to him by the land owners themselves. mary aiken

Anonymous said...

Have u tried any of the other blog sites like nfh or the state websites? You should have your lot surveyed to have your pins put back where they should be if thye have been moved. imo.

Anonymous said...

What does nfh stand for? Can you tell me some of the state sites that you are talking about. I did find the hole that the pin came out of but im not going to put it back as then I would be moving a land pin that is illegal to do. In time I will have to have this line surveyed again but it was just done last fall. I only need it done about 100' but I want it to be legal so there wont be any problems. We will see what is going to happen with this appeal first. mary aiken

Anonymous said...

How did the supreme court go? I agree with the last post, if you feel the pins were moved the easiest way to prove that is have a survey done. I find it hard to believe that there is this much corruption banks, judges, city, lawyers, there must be more to the story or you just got bad legal advise. in my opinion

Anonymous said...

We have not gone to the Supreme court yet. They have excepted the case so the transcripts have been ordered. I dont know how long it will be. I have read lots of cases on the supreme court and they seem to be very fair. Avery one that we have showned this case to has seen right through it. They are not judges and they know what is going on. It boils down to the good old boy club. They are all looking for a way out and who will get out first. They will are banking on us to stop but that is not going to happen. The most important thing to me in life is to stand up for what you believe in. Never just give up on what is yours. thank you for listening to me mary aiken

Anonymous said...

I have read the posts and am confused. what do you mean by everyone you shown this case to has seen right through it? Do you mean the attorneys, judges, and/or govt agencies? I am still dont understand how much land is being stole? You said the person owns 22 but you mention 35 so is it 13 acrs that is being stole? why do you think you put your attorney in a bad postion he works for you doesnt he? I know somone that went through something like this I will see if i can get the information on how she handed it. thank you for your time.

Anonymous said...

Let me see if I can explain this to you a little better 23 years ago they did a subdivision on the 35 acres and gave a little bit of land to three different lots. The city told them they the 35 acre lot was landlocked as it didnt have any frontage to that lot. So at that time the city would only let 2 lots per one driveway. So the lot beside us had told the city it had roadfrontage,as it was his lot after his mother died. But the catch of this is the frontage was never switch over to his lot that was beside it so the second lot never had road frontage legal. They did a draw of the straw deal. Hoping that no one would catch them. Now after the subdivision was done they all released all rights and interest to the three lots. After 23 years the lot that was subdivied remained with 22 acres left. The uncle gives the land to his nephew. Never changing the deed saying he still has 35 acres of land. Now on that land there was never a right of way to this piece of land. The discription on the deed only gives the land with no way to it. So the nephew goes and has a deed saying that it is a corrective deed and he puts in the deed that he has a right-of-way to go across all of the three parcel to get to his lot. When the previous owner released all rights and iterest to land 23 years ago. As he knew that his road frontage was not his. So he needs a way to get to his home. So he is using our driveway to get to his home. He got away with this because his friends were on the planning board as the chairman. He never got a permit for a driveway as that would have shown that he didnt have the road frontage that he needed to get to his property. Two weeks ago he rototilled our driveway thinking I wasnt home but I was taking pictures of him all the time he was doing it. Last Sunday he moved another pin in the corner of our property. I check the pins each day as this guy is just plain stupid and thinks he is going to get away with what ever he wants to do. mary aiken

Anonymous said...

05/04/06
That did not make it any better I am still confused actually more confused. Still dont know what was stolen. I dont understand why you dont get the line surveyed if you are so sure the pins have been moved and get your land back. What is a straw deal? What does your lawyer say about all this?

Anonymous said...

Why were they rototilling your driveway?

Anonymous said...

First to let you know how I know the pins have been moved as I took pictures of the pins before they were moved. Then took another picture of the pins where they were placed. Now to tell you about what land he is taking is the driveway and about 4 to 6 ft in different places of the drive that he has widen to try to make it wide enough to make city ordiances. But the ordiances for a right-of-way in 1989 was 50 feet. The most the driveway was then at 13 ft and that was after he started widening the drive. As we had put the driveway in and it was the width of the blade making it only 9 ft. mary aiken

Anonymous said...

As to the rototilling they did it because they think that is how to maintain a road I guess. As for them maintaining the driveway before the previous owner sold the property to him he never had a right-of-way deeded to him at all. There for he had no reason for maintaining or doing nothing to the driveway at all. He only got a right-of-way to go across the 3 properties from a corrective deed. That he had a attorney office make up after 23 years after they released all rights and interest to the land. Now I hope you can understand what is going on. mary aiken

Anonymous said...

it sounds to me that most of what your saying is made up by you because you do not have a strait answer for anything

Anonymous said...

This is from teh NH Court website, did you try this? Has the Attorney general responded? Someone asked what your lawyer thinks, please respond.

Q: What should I do if I think the judge acted improperly in my case?

A: You should discuss the matter with your lawyer. Complaints about a judge can be filed with the Judicial Conduct Committee, Anthony McManus, Executive Secretary, (603) 749-4464. See Judicial Conduct Committee for details.

Anonymous said...

I dont know just how much clearer I can be. Deeds were made giving a reserved right-of-way to someone that had no right to reserve it in the first place. His name was put on the deed to get to a landlocked parcel of land. Hoping that they would never get caught. But they did get caught.Then when the land got sold without a valid right-of-way to it they just did a corrective deed giving a right-of-way that wasnt rightfully there's.As for my attorney all she says is that they we have to go by the steps to get what we want. mary aiken

Anonymous said...

These posts confuse me. So there is a Right of Way, is that what you are saying but the owner did not have the right to do that. So the land you bought from the owner is the same owner that reserved the right of way? So if he/she had no right to give a right of way then they should not have the right to sell the land. How did he get caught? If you have truely written to the attorney general and news organizations, I cant believe there is any corruption if none of these organizations have investigated. imo.

Anonymous said...

I went to the NH deeds online and it is clear to see why the judge did not rule in your favor. Your property is burdened by a right of way. It is very clear, not sure where you are getting your legal advise and not sure your post are very accurate. imo

Anonymous said...

I guess you too have not seen that on each deed at the end of the deeds they gave up all there rights and interest in the land showing that they had abandon they right-of-way. So you can see just how it has been done. Showing from the land deeds this 35 acrea lot was landlocked and nerver had a way to it until in 1980 putting his name on the land of Roger Sargent land to reserve a right-of-way that was not his land or even the land of Roger Sargents. As if you look at the deeds of Roger Sargent his land never even went pass the stone wall and now it goes to the road showing the deeds were frauded in 1980. It is confusing but if you do a deed search good you will see it. mary aiken

Anonymous said...

sounds like you need to take this to supreme court are you going to and if yes when are you going

Anonymous said...

Are you serious? Who told you that statement means they abandoned their right of way. That is not what that statement is referring to. Are you sure you have an attorney?

Anonymous said...

DID JAILFORJUDGES OR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL CONTACT YOU?

Anonymous said...

It has been my experience with blogs that when people dont answer simple questions and ramble about things that were not asked, they are usually not telling the truth. Just look at these posts none of the questions were ever answered. imo

Mark Yannone said...

The facts of this case would be easier to follow if they were outlined as simply as possible, using numbered statements. Omit the speculations and the accusations, and stick to the bare facts. Keep it short and simple.

Anonymous said...

i am not sure how old these posts are but i guess when asked to state the facts of the case no one responded..from what i read it sounds like a disgruntled neighbor and sounds like there is no case or the level of corruption that is mentioned.
imo

Mark Yannone said...

The original date was February 14, 2006, shown above the story's heading.

The author's e-mail address is shown, if you wish to communicate directly.

Anonymous said...

I'd say you're just upset that you have someone living on the land which you were used to calling your own. Even if it wasn't. Perhaps you should try to be neighborly in stead.